• Address: Glendale, CA
  • Make a call: 818.275.2465
  • Email Address: info@baghoomianlaw.com


The Impact of Internal Revenue Code 280E on Cannabis Delivery Services in California: A Closer Look at Cost of Goods Sold

The cannabis industry has been experiencing exponential growth in California since the legalization of recreational use in 2016. With the rise of cannabis delivery services, understanding the tax implications for these businesses is crucial. One of the most important aspects to consider is the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 280E, which has a significant impact on how cannabis delivery services calculate their cost of goods sold (COGS). In this blog post, we will delve into the implications of IRC 280E on cannabis delivery services in California and how they can optimize their cost of goods sold.

Understanding IRC 280E

IRC 280E is a federal tax provision that disallows tax deductions for businesses involved in trafficking controlled substances, which includes cannabis under the federal Controlled Substances Act. Although cannabis is legal in California, it remains illegal under federal law, making cannabis businesses subject to this provision. This means that cannabis delivery services are unable to deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses, such as rent, utilities, and wages, from their taxable income. However, they can still deduct the cost of goods sold.

The Importance of Cost of Goods Sold for Cannabis Delivery Services

The cost of goods sold is a critical financial metric for any business, as it represents the direct costs associated with producing the goods sold by a company. For cannabis delivery services in California, optimizing the cost of goods sold is crucial because it directly affects their taxable income. As IRC 280E limits the deductions they can claim, lowering their taxable income becomes essential to minimize their tax burden.

Calculating Cost of Goods Sold

Cannabis delivery services can calculate their cost of goods sold by considering the direct expenses associated with acquiring, processing, and delivering cannabis products to customers.


These costs may include:

  1. Purchase price of cannabis products
  2. Transportation costs to acquire products from suppliers
  3. Storage costs, such as warehouse rent and utilities
  4. Packaging and labeling expenses
  5. Direct labor costs, like wages for employees involved in product handling and delivery.

Optimizing Cost of Goods Sold

Cannabis delivery services in California can take several measures to optimize their cost of goods sold and reduce their tax liabilities. Some of these strategies include:


  1. Inventory Management: Implementing an efficient inventory management system helps businesses track their products, minimize waste, and maintain accurate records of their costs. This can result in a more accurate cost of goods sold calculation and ensure compliance with tax regulations.
  2. Supplier Negotiations: Building strong relationships with suppliers and negotiating better prices can help cannabis delivery services lower their acquisition costs. This can have a direct impact on reducing the cost of goods sold.
  3. Streamlining Operations: By streamlining operations and investing in technologies that improve efficiency, cannabis delivery services can reduce labor and transportation costs. This can help lower their overall cost of goods sold and improve their bottom line.
  4. Cost Allocation: Properly allocating indirect costs to the cost of goods sold can help businesses maximize their deductible expenses. Consulting with a tax professional or accountant who understands the unique challenges of the cannabis industry can ensure that expenses are allocated correctly.

Educating Employees and Management: Education is a vital aspect of optimizing cost of goods sold for cannabis delivery services. By training employees and management on IRC 280E and its implications, businesses can ensure that everyone is working together to lower costs and improve efficiency.

Compliance with State and Local Regulations: Ensuring compliance with state and local regulations in California is critical for cannabis delivery services. Non-compliance can result in fines, penalties, and even loss of licensure, which can significantly impact a company’s bottom line. Staying updated on regulatory changes and maintaining open communication with local authorities can help businesses avoid these pitfalls.

Vertical Integration: One way for cannabis delivery services to reduce their cost of goods sold is by pursuing vertical integration. This involves controlling multiple stages of the supply chain, from cultivation to retail. By controlling these aspects, businesses can potentially lower their costs and improve their overall profit margins.

Diversification of Product Offerings: Expanding product offerings can help cannabis delivery services in California reduce their reliance on high-cost items. By offering a diverse range of products, they can cater to various customer preferences and budgets, potentially reducing their cost of goods sold.

In conclusion, the impact of Internal Revenue Code 280E on cannabis delivery services in California is significant and presents unique challenges for these businesses. By focusing on optimizing their cost of goods sold and implementing strategic measures, they can reduce their tax liabilities and remain competitive in the growing cannabis industry. Working with knowledgeable tax professionals and staying informed about industry-specific regulations is essential for the long-term success of these businesses in the ever-evolving landscape of cannabis legalization.